Decentralized, resilient, cannot be taken down easily
Said on the homepage: servers “optionally communicate,” forming a network “that cannot be controlled by a single provider.” Vision copy: a network “that cannot be taken down easily.”
Found in the docs: dSync is a small custom library. The principles page says implementing server-to-server communication is not ideal because “there arent any known instances yet” and the client is still incomplete. Federation with Matrix, ActivityPub, or Nostr is explicitly refused. Voice historically used Google’s public STUN server.
Homepage · Principles.md · r/dcts, “No, i will never implement matrix…”
dcts.exposed